9 Referanser


  1. International classification of diseases (9th revision). Geneva, World Health Organization, 1977.
  2. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th revision). Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992.
  3. International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC). Chicago, World Organization National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians (Wonca)/American Hospital Association (AHA), 1975.
  4. ICHPPC-2 (International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979.
  5. ICHPPC-2-Defined: International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care, 3rd edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983.
  6. Report of the International Conference on Primary Care, Alma Ata, USSR, 6-12 September 1978; WHO/Alma Ata/78.10.
  7. Meads, S. The WHO Reason for Encounter classification. WHO Chronicle 1983; 37(5): 159-162.
  8. Lamberts H, Meads S, and Wood M. Classification of reasons why persons seek primary care: pilot study of a new system. Public Health Rep 1984; 99: 597-605.
  9. Lamberts H, Meads S, and Wood M. Results of the international field trial with the Reason for Encounter Classification (RFEC). Med Sociale Preventive 1985; 30: 80-87.
  10. Working party to develop a classification of the `Reasons for Contact with Primary Health Care Services'. Report to the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1981.
  11. Wood M. Family medicine classification systems in evolution. J Fam Pract 1981; 12: 199-200.
  12. Lamberts H, Meads S, and Wood M. Results of the field trial with the Reason for Encounter Classification (RFEC). In: Cote RA, Protti AJ, and Scherner JR (ed.) Role of Informatics in Health Data Coding and Classification Systems. Amsterdam, Elsevier/JFIP-JMIA, 1985.
  13. Bentsen BG. International Classification of Primary Care. Scand J Prim Health Care 1986; 4: 43-56.
  14. Lamberts H, Wood M, Hofmans-Okkes I, red. The International Classification of Primary Care in the European Community: with Multi-Language Layer. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993.
  15. Lamberts H and Wood M, red. ICPC: International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987.
  16. Bridges-Webb C, Britt H, Miles DA, Neary S, Charles J, and Traynor V. Morbidity and treatment in general practice in Australia 1990-1991. Med J Aust 1992; 157, Suppl. 19 Oct: SI-S56.
  17. Hofmans-Okkes IM and Lamberts H. The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC): new applications in research and computer based patient records in family practice. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 294-302.
  18. Wood M, Lamberts H, Meijer JS, and Hofmans-Okkes IM. The conversion between ICPC and ICD-10: requirements for a family of classification systems in the next decade. In: Lamberts H, Wood M, and Hofman-Okkes I, red. The International Classification of Primary Care in the European Community: with Multi-Language Layer. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993: 18-24.
  19. Bentzen N, red. An international glossary for general/family practice. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 341-369.
  20. Jamoulle M and Roland M. Classification Internationale des Soins Primaires (traduction francaise de l'ICPC). Edition Alexandre Lacassagne, Lyon, 1992.
  21. Jamoulle M and Roland M. Approches taxonomiques en medicine de famille assorties d'une terminologie medicale normalisee et classifiee a usage informatique en soins de sante primaires. CARE Editions, Brussels, 2 vol., 1996.
  22. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, and Vanselow NA, red. Primary care: America's health in a new era. Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1996.
  23. Hofmans-Okkes IM. An international study into the concept and validity of the `reason for encounter'. In: Lamberts H, Wood M, and Hofmans-Okkes IM, red. The International Classification of Primary Care in the European Community, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993: 34-44.
  24. Nylenna, M. Why do our patients see us? A study of reasons for encounter in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1985; 3: 155-162.
  25. International Classification of Process in Primary Care (IC-Process-PC). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
  26. Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, and Tse C-KJ. The Duke Severity of Illness Checklist (DUSOI) for measurement of severity and comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 379-393.
  27. Parkerson GR Jr, Bridges-Webb C, Gervas J, Hofmans-Okkes I, Lamberts H, Froom J, Fischer G, Meyboom-de Jong B, Klinkman M, and Maeseneer J. Classification of severity of health problems in family/general practice: an international field trial. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 303-309.
  28. Shrout PE and Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability, Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.
  29. Wonca Classification Committee. Functional status in primary care. New York, Springer, 1990.
  30. Scholten JHG and van Weel C. Functional Status Assessment in Family Practice. MEDITekst CIP-Gegevens Koninklikje Bibliotheek, The Hague, 1992.
  31. van Weel C, Konig-Zahn C, Touw-Otten FWMM, van Duijn NP, and Meyboomde Jong B. Measuring functional health status with the COOP/Wonca Charts: a manual. CIP-Gegevens Koninklijke Bibiliotheek, The Hague, 1995.
  32. Nelson EC, Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice. Description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987; 40 (Suppl. 1): 55s-64s.
  33. Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, and Tse C-KJ. The Duke Health Profile, a 17-item measure of health and dysfunction. Med Care 1990; 28: 1056-1072.
  34. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile. Conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 393.
  35. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zahn C, red. Cross cultural health outcome assessment: a user's guide. European Research Group on Health Outcomes (ERGHO), 1997; 1-184.
  36. Bentsen B, Natvig B, Winnem M. Assessment of own functional capacity. COOP-Wonca charts in clinical work and research (in Norwegian, English summary). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997; 117: 1790-93.